Skip Navigation


Faculty and Staff

Faculty and Staff

Professor giving a biology lecture

Resources for Online Instruction

If you have questions regarding HuskyCT support or if you need assistance on course preparation or delivery, please reach out to for help from CETL.

User guides and information specific to Educational Technologies can be found here:

View and register for upcoming CETL online workshops(more workshops are being added daily) by clicking here:

Recorded webinars and tutorials explaining some tools available for teaching can be found here:

CETL has many helpful resources and services available on their website:

Items from the library can be requested online through the library catalog.  Information on streaming can be found by clicking here.  Shelley Goldstein is available via Webex, Teams, and email to support any curricular/research needs.

Technology Support

If you have technology questions, below is contact information for Waterbury’s IT Support.  The preferred method of communication is emailing all 3 IT support members.


At the University of Connecticut, we’re committed to supporting our faculty and staff. Learn more!


Quick Links

Maintenance Report/Room Set-Up Form
Student Admin (PeopleSoft)
Faculty Program Fund Request Form
Pre-Recognition Social RSVP
UConn-Waterbury Faculty and Staff Room Reservation Request Form

Workers Compensation/Health and Safety Committee Members

Angela Brightly
Senior Associate Director, Waterbury Campus Craig Wallett
Facilities Manager, Facilities Regional Campus Services Mary Jane Smith
Laboratory Technician 3, Biology, Waterbury Campus Dolores Ragauskas
Financial Assistant, Waterbury Campus Michael McDevitt
Facilities Regional Campus Services

Important Resources for Faculty

View the Information Packet for assistance with:

  • Course Cancellations
  • Classroom Technology
  • Copier Rooms and Access Codes
  • Employment Contracts
  • Exam Booklets (Blue Books)
  • Human Resources
  • Parking Decals
  • Payroll
  • Room Reservations
  • Syllabi

Plagiarism Information

These information below is designed to support faculty in creating a culture of academic integrity in their classrooms. Specifically, they address plagiarism prevention, detection, and reporting. The information also emphasizes the importance of teaching students proper and citation and documentation practices. This resource has been divided into five main areas:

  1. What is Plagiarism? – FAQs from faculty on definitions of academic misconduct.
  2. Prevention – measures faculty can take to help prevent Plagiarism within undergraduates’ written work.
  3. Detection – ways to detect Plagiarism.
  4. How to Handle a Plagiarism Situation – information on University of Connecticut guidelines including proper notification to an implicated student.
  5. Citation Help – information is provided for citing online resources using MLA, APA and Chicago style.
  6. Recognizing The Teaching Moment in A Plagiarism Case – faculty should also consider how a plagiarism situation can be turned into something more than punitive.

If you have a question about Internet Plagiarism as it relates to the University of Connecticut Student Conduct Code, please contact Dr.Stuart Brown, Director of Student Services at 203-236-9847 or via e-mail at

What is Plagiarism?

  • The FAQ link includes FAQs from faculty concerning definitions of academic misconduct.
  • Additional resources for faculty can be found here.

Internet Plagiarism Prevention Measures

The responsibility for preventing plagiarism and academic dishonesty falls on instructors across the disciplines and at all levels of the curriculum. At the Waterbury campus, students receive an introduction to academic integrity and related issues in their First-Year Experience course (FYE), although it is worth noting that FYE instructors do not address specific documentation practices here and neither are all students required to take FYE. Students receive more in-depth instruction in academic integrity in First-Year English (which most incoming students are required to take), but this instruction is primarily in MLA (Modern Language Association) documentation practices and guidelines. Therefore, it is crucial that instructors beyond these courses spend time teaching their students about the appropriate practices in their specific disciplines and remind students about UConn’s rules governing academic integrity.

There are a number of other proactive strategies faculty can take to lessen Internet-based plagiarism. A six point list is enumerated below. A comprehensive policy, “Defining and Avoiding Plagiarism: The WPA Statement on Best Practices,” has been developed by the Council of Writing Program Administrators.

  1. Statement on Course Syllabi-Faculty should include a statement on their course syllabi about academic misconduct. The University of Connecticut Student Code, under the heading, “Academic Integrity in Undergraduate Education and Research,” reads:

    “Academic misconduct is dishonest or unethical academic behavior that includes, but is not limited, to misrepresenting mastery in an academic area (e.g., cheating), intentionally or knowingly failing to properly credit information, research or ideas to their rightful originators or representing such information, research or ideas as your own (e.g., plagiarism).”

    See below for sample statements about academic integrity from UConn-Waterbury faculty’s syllabi.
  2. In-Class Discussion-A quick “Plagiarism Quiz” developed by Karen Cajka, a former Freshman English Coordinator at the University of Connecticut, can be downloaded for use in the classroom.
  3. Crafting Assignments-Assignments can be designed to stem and discourage plagiarism.
  4. Citing Online Sources-Faculty are responsible for teaching their students how to cite and document sources. This can help prevent unintentional plagiarism.
  5. Utilize Library Services-
    • Librarians are available to collaborate on assignments and assist in creating meaningful research experiences for your students.
    • Schedule a tailored research session with a librarian for your class. Students overcome fears associated with research in these workshops. Sessions focus on selecting appropriate sources, searching library databases and the Web, or evaluating information.
  6. Contact Waterbury Campus Librarian Shelley Goldstein at to schedule an in-class session.

Sample Statements About Academic Integrity

Sample Statement One Expand Sample Statement Two Expand Academic Integrity: Any form of academic misconduct will not be permitted in this course. You are responsible for familiarizing yourself with the details of academic misconduct”Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to:-Providing or receiving assistance on academic work (papers, projects, examinations) in a way that was not authorized by the instructor-Any attempt to improperly influence (bribery, threats) any member of the faculty, staff, or administration of the University in any matter relating to academics or research-Plagiarism-Doing academic work for another student-Presenting the same or substantially the same papers or projects in two or more courses without the explicit permission of the instructors-Situations where one student knowingly assists another student in committing an act of academic misconduct, and any student doing so will be held equally accountable for the violation” Sample Statement Three Expand

“Academic Integrity: A fundamental tenet of all educational institutions is academic honesty; academic work depends upon respect for and acknowledgement of the research and ideas of others. Misrepresenting someone else’s work as one’s own is a serious offense in any academic setting and it will not be condoned. Academic misconduct includes, but is not limited to, providing or receiving assistance in a manner not authorized by the instructor in the creation of work to be submitted for academic evaluation (e.g. papers, projects, and examinations); any attempt to influence improperly (e.g. bribery, threats) any member of the faculty, staff, or administration of the University in any matter pertaining to academics or research; presenting, as one’s own, the ideas or words of another for academic evaluation; doing unauthorized academic work for which another person will receive credit or be evaluated; and presenting the same or substantially the same papers or projects in two or more courses without the explicit permission of the instructors involved. A student who knowingly assists another student in committing an act of academic misconduct shall be equally accountable for the violation, and shall be subject to the sanctions and other remedies described in The Student Code: (”

Sample Statement Four Expand Academic Integrity
Every effort will be made by me to uphold standards of academic excellence in this 4-credit course. All sources must be acknowledged. Plagiarism (intentionally or unintentionally representing or misrepresenting the ideas, language, and structure of other writers as your own), cheating, and academic dishonesty of any sort have serious consequences at the University of Connecticut. If you plagiarize in any way and at any point, penalties will be applied, including danger of failing the course. You need to use sources in order to do your culminating academic work, and the faculty wants you to practice correct ways of using them, so together we will take these responsibilities seriously.Instructions for avoiding plagiarism will be addressed throughout the course. Individual concerns will be handled confidentially in conference. Ask specific questions about your written work when you are unsure how to proceed. And do not hesitate to address any potentially plagiaristic portions of a manuscript if I recommend that you do so. Mutual respect for academic integrity in handling textual material is a key element of this core UConn course. Sample Statement Five Expand Academic Dishonesty (e.g. cheating, plagiarism):
A fundamental concept of all educational institutions is academic honesty.  All academic work depends upon respect for and acknowledgment of research and ideas of others.  Misrepresentation of someone else’s work as one’s own is a most serious offense in any academic setting.  For further information on academic integrity issues, refer to Section XI, Academic Misconduct, from the University of Connecticut Student Conduct  Code.If you consult any criticism in writing your papers, you must acknowledge this by including a Works Cited list at the end of your paper.  This includes works like Cliffs Notes, or online sources like SparkNotes, which should be treated like any other source.  If you borrow any ideas from any source, you should acknowledge your debt specifically with a parenthetical reference like this:  “(Poirier 137),” which means that the idea may be found on page 137 of the book by Poirier listed alphabetically in your Works Cited list.  If you borrow any of the writer’s actual language, you should put the words in quotation marks and then note the source with the same kind of parenthetical reference.If you use any sources from the Internet, you should cite them in the same way, giving the exact web-address in your Works Cited list and including a reference in parentheses in your text.  If you use a restricted site (i.e. one which cannot be accessed without paying a fee), you must include with your paper a complete printout of the passages from which you drew information or quotations.The point of all such documentation is:  1) to be thoroughly open about your research, and 2) to make it easy for your reader to check any references for accuracy (to make sure you have not altered the quotation or misrepresented its context).

Helpful Hints in Detecting Internet Plagiarism

Detecting plagiarism and incidents of academic dishonesty can be difficult particularly in the digital age. In this section you will find some resources on ways to detect instances of plagiarism. Please also refer to the resources on how to make these punitive moments teaching moments, in addition to some of the pedagogical problems with plagiarism detection services like and SafeAssign.

Detecting plagiarism derived from the Internet does not always require the use of high tech tools or sophisticated search techniques. Many times, especially in lower division courses, the “clues” are rather straightforward. For example, Shelley Goldstein, the Waterbury Campus head librarian, instructs faculty to look for the following as examples of potential plagiarism indicators:

  • Unusual formatting
  • Strange layout
  • Essay was printed from a browser
  • References with missing citations
  • Is a paper off topic with loosely related paragraphs and awkward construction?
  • Extensive use of jargon or advanced vocabulary.
  • Frequent changes in terminology consistent with extensive cutting & pasting.
Handling a Plagiarism Situation
It is not always easy to decide whether to charge a student with plagiarism. In this section you will find resources to help you make the decision, including a series of scenarios of academic dishonesty and possible responses to those. As you make the decision as to whether or not to formally charge a student with academic misconduct, keep in mind that although it may be a student’s first infraction in your class, he or she may have already plagiarized in other classes. If instructors continue to deal with the issue “behind closed doors” rather than through the official channels, students who need to both be punished for and educated about academic dishonesty are not getting those opportunities.

What do you do when you believe a student has plagiarized, using the Internet or not? Some faculty want to handle the matter “quietly” and simply have the student rewrite the paper. The Office of Student Affairs encourages faculty to follow the prescribed procedure which safeguards both the faculty member and the student. More importantly, if students know that faculty are treating Plagiarism seriously there is a better chance for reducing the practice.

Plagiarism Scenarios and Possible Responses
The specific steps to take are an abridged version of the University of Connecticut Student Code, Appendix A – Academic Integrity in Undergraduate Education and Research (italics have been added to key points):
  1. When the instructor of record or designee (instructor) believes that an act of academic misconduct has occurred s/he is responsible for saving the evidence in its original form and need not return any of the original papers or other materials to the student. Copies of the student’s work and information about other evidence will be provided to the student upon request.
  2. When an instructor believes there is sufficient information to demonstrate a case of academic misconduct, s/he shall notify the student in writing of the allegation of misconduct and the academic consequences that the instructor will impose. The written notification shall also inform the student whether the case has been referred to the Academic Misconduct Hearing Board for consideration of additional sanctions. The instructor shall send the written notification to the student with a copy to the Office of Student Affairs at the Waterbury Campus.
  3. The student has 5 business days from receipt of the written notice to respond to the instructor and/or to request a hearing (see “Academic Misconduct Board”). If the student does not respond within the allotted time the instructor’s sanctions shall be imposed. If the student requests a hearing the instructor shall forward the request to the Office of Student Affairs at the Waterbury Campus. If the student and the instructor reach a mutually acceptable resolution of the case the instructor shall notify the Office of Student Affairs of the agreement. The instructor shall also notify the Office of Student Affairs if s/he withdraws the allegation of misconduct. A student who has been notified that s/he has been accused of academic misconduct may not withdraw from the course in which the alleged misconduct has occurred without the approval of the Board.
  4. The appropriate academic consequence for serious offenses is generally considered to be failure in the course. 
    For less serious offenses regarding small portions of the course work, failure for that portion is suggested with the requirement that the student repeat the work for no credit. The following are guidelines for Academic Misconduct Sanctions to assist faculty in determining the type of sanction that should be assigned to an infraction. Sanction Guidelines
  5. Normally, written notification shall occur within thirty (30) days of the discovery of the alleged misconduct.

A sample letter, developed by the University of Connecticut’s Department of English, can also be downloaded and printed out on University letterhead. Stuart Brown from the Office of Student Affairs can assist faculty that have questions.

How to Properly Cite Materials From the Internet

There are many reasons why students do not properly cite source materials from the Internet. One of the most common is lack of knowledge. Bewilderment abounds as students seek the answer to the new-age question, “How do I cite off the Internet?” Below are two web sites that provide an excellent resource for faculty and students:

  1. Faculty are responsible for teaching their students how to cite and document sources.This can help prevent unintentional plagiarism.
  2. Another tool is Refworks, a citation tool that allows students to organize records and ultimately create bibliographies in a variety of formats. Their home page also includes a short video produced by the company. There is even a section on UConn-specific tutorials that briefly walk users through how to import citations from many library databases.

Recognizing The Teaching Moment in a Plagiarism Case

An opportunity to teach students about plagiarism also arises once a student has plagiarized. When punishing or charging a student with plagiarism, faculty should also consider how that moment can be turned into something more than punitive. Consider the following ways to make that moment into a teaching moment:

  1. The student rewrites the plagiarized assignment, using sources honestly and correctly for some credit or simply as an exercise in using sources responsibly (without getting credit). The student writes a reflection letter to the instructor about the differences between the two assignments.
  2. The student familiarizes him/herself with the Purdue OWL (Online Writing Lab) and does a short presentation to the instructor during office hours about the resources it provides on citation practices.
  3. The student studies the university’s honor code and writes a short essay about which aspects he/she violated.
  4. The student reads 1-2 short articles about academic integrity/plagiarism/cheating and writes a response paper to these using correct citation practices throughout.